I'm a competitive age-group triathlete — 3× GB Age Group World Championships qualifier, sub-1hr Ironman swimmer. I don't buy swim gadgets on faith — I test them.
I ran the EZ Hydro-Glide across three sessions: two pool tests (400m time trial + 6×100m intervals) and one open water session. Every session was a solo effort — no feet in front, no drafting advantage.
The numbers:
Pool 400m TT: 5:30 with device vs. 5:36 PB without — 6 seconds faster
Pool 100m intervals: consistent ~5 sec/100m improvement across all reps
Open water 550m loop: ~5 sec/100m improvement vs. pre-device baseline
The consistency is what stands out. This isn't one lucky swim — it's the same result across different formats, distances, and environments (pool and open water, with and without wetsuit).
The mechanism makes sense when you think it through. The device puts your head in an optimal position and breaks the water more hydrodynamically. Better head position cascades through the whole body — it lifts your torso, which raises your hips, which reduces drag at the hip and kick zone. The whole body sits higher and flatter in the water, and you're faster as a result.
Caveats: This is personal testing, not a controlled study. Sample size is three sessions. I'd want more data before drawing firm conclusions about long-term adaptation. But as an initial result? It's compelling enough that I'll be wearing it at my next start line.
At 5 sec/100m over a 3.8km Ironman swim, that's roughly 3 minutes off my swim split. My current Ironman swim PB is 57:14 — that puts a sub-54 in range. In a sport where every minute saved in the water means fresher legs on the bike and run, that's not a marginal gain.